Good for Business: Applying the ACRL Framework Threshold Concepts to Teach a Learner-Centered Business Research Course

Charissa Odelia Jefferson

Abstract


This article discusses a librarian-designed and facilitated credit-bearing course, which utilizes the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Threshold Concepts and transforms from Bloom’s Taxonomy to a learner-centered course redesign with Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning. Assessment results reveal a panel of data over the 2015-2016 academic year offering perspectives at the beginning and end of each semester and over the course of the entire academic year’s trajectory of learning. In an effort to imbue more affective learning outcomes, and based on answers received from fall assessments, the author altered the spring assessment to query student confidence levels and the value of the library. This article provides lesson plans that highlight each of the six Information Literacy Threshold Concepts in a business context and offers a trajectory toward significant and lifelong learning.


Keywords


Assessment; Information Literacy Instruction; Threshold Concepts; ACRL Framework; Learner-Centered; Instruction Design; Business Research; Fink’s Taxonomy; Bloom’s Taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Blumberg, P. (2009). Developing learner-centered teaching: A practical guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Barkley, E. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bloom, B.S, et, al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive domain [image].

Retrieved from: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/59/Bloomtaxonomy.jpg.

Bond, P. (2016). Addressing information literacy through student-centered learning. Education for Information, 32, 3-9. DOI 10.3233/EFI-150961.

Bravender, P., McClure, H. A., & Schaub, G. (2015). Teaching information literacy threshold concepts: Lesson plans for librarians. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckingham; Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Burgess, C. (2015). Teaching students, not standards: The new ACRL information literacy framework and threshold crossings for instructors. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 10(1).

Christensen, M.K. (2015). Designing one-shot sessions around threshold concepts. Internet ReferenceServices Quarterly, 20(4), 97-104. DOI: 10.1080/10875301.2015.1109573

Dahlen, S. (2012). Seeing college students as adults: Learner-centered strategies for information literacy instruction. Endnotes: The Journal of the New Members Roundtable, 3(1).

Fink, L. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Fink’s Taxonomy of significant learning (2003) [image].

Retrieved from: http://www.uwb.edu/getattachment/learningtech/instructional-design/integrated-course-design/Taxonomy-(1).jpg

Foasberg, N.M. (2015). From standards to frameworks for IL: How the ACRL framework addresses critiques of the standards. Libraries and the Academy, 15(4), 699-717.

"Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education", American Library Association, February 9, 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

Gibson, C., & Jacobson, T. (2014). Informing and extending the draft ACRL information literacy framework for higher education: An overview and avenues for research. College & Research Libraries, 75(3), 250-254.

Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2011). Causality orientations moderate the undermining effect of rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 485-489.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.010

Houtman, E. (2015). Mind-blowing: Fostering self-regulated learning in information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(1), 6-18.

Huba, M. & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Nilson, L.B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research based resource for college instructors. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

O’Neill, G. & Murphy, F. (2010). Assessment: Guide to taxonomies of learning. University College of Dublin Teaching and Learning Resources.

Retrieved from: http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/ucdtla0034.pdf

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1586.

Walter, S. (2008). Librarians as teachers: A qualitative inquiry into professional identity. College & Research Libraries, 69(1), 51-71.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.