Scholarly Management Publication and Open Access Funding Mandates: a Review of Publisher Policies

Jessica Lange

Abstract


The open access movement has been growing steadily over the past twenty years. Recently, many national funding agencies in North America have been requiring recipients of grant-funding to make their articles open access  On the surface this produces a potential conflict for management researchers; management faculty members are expected to publish in prestigious journals but the discipline views open access journals as being of lower quality (Hahn & Wyatt, 2014, p.98). As such, the question arises if it is it possible for management researchers to comply with open access policies while still publishing in highly-ranked journals?

 

This article will compare publishing policies from top management journals to funding agencies’ open access requirements in order to determine which journals meet these conditions.  Journals will be drawn from several established journal lists such as the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) 24, the Financial Times (FT) Research Rankings, and Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science Journal Citation Reports. Results show that 80% of journals in the sample set are compatible with open access funding mandates. Of the journals which are compatible, 48% require an APC and 52% permit self-archiving in an acceptable time-frame.

 

In addition to discussing open access publishing opportunities in management, this article will highlight opportunities for management librarians to develop their services and act as resources for faculty navigating this new framework.  


Keywords


publisher policies, OA, funding, management journals

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72-95.

Björk B.C., Welling P., Laakso M., Majlender P., Hedlund T., & Guðnason, G.. (2010) OA to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE 5(6): e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273

Calarco, P, Shearer, K., Schmidt, B., & Tate, D. (2016). Librarians' competencies profile for scholarly communication and OA. Retrieved from https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/Competencies-for-ScholComm-and-OA_June-2016.pdf

Elsevier (n.d.). OA options. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-business-venturing/0883-9026/open-access-options#fee

Executive Office of the President: Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2013, February 22). Memorandum for the heads of Executive departments and agencies. Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf

Financial Times. (2012, February 22.) 45 journals used in FT Research rank. Retrieved from https://next.ft.com/content/3405a512-5cbb-11e1-8f1f-00144feabdc0

Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C. and Probets, S. (2003). RoMEO studies 4: An analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16, 293–308. doi:10.1087/095315103322422053

Gargour, Y., Larivère, V., Gingras, Y., & Harnad, S. (2012). Green and gold OA percentages and growth, by discipline. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664

Government of Canada. (2015, February 22). Tri-Agency policy on OA publications. Retrieved from http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=F6765465-1

Hahn, S. E., & Wyatt, A. (2014). Business faculty’s attitudes: OA, disciplinary repositories, and institutional repositories. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 19(2), 93–113. doi:10.1080/08963568.2014.883875

Laakso, M. (2013). Green OA policies of scholarly journal publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475–494. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lyons, C., & Booth, H. A. (2011). An overview of OA in the fields of business and management. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship,16(2), 108–124. doi:10.1080/08963568.2011.554786

McCabe, M.J., & Synder, C.M. (2016). OA as a crude solution to a hold-up problem

in the two-sided market for academic journals. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=914525

Morris, S. (2009). Journal authors’ rights: Perceptions and reality. Retrieved from http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/110-prc-projects/summary-papers/journal-authors-rights-summary-paper/140-journal-authors-rights-perception-and-reality

Naveen Jindal School of Management. (n.d.). List of journals. Retrieved from http://jindal.utdallas.edu/the-utd-top-100-business-school-research-rankings/list-of-journals

Suber, P. (2012). OA. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thomson Reuters.(2015). InCitesTM Journal citation reports®. Retrieved from Web of Science™ database.

Xia, J. & Gilchrist, S. B. & Smith, N. X. & Kingery, J. A. & Radecki, J. R. & Wilhelm, M. L. & Harrison, K. C. & Ashby, M. L. & Mahn, A. J. (2012). A review of OA self-archiving mandate policies." portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(1), 85-102. doi:10.1353/pla.2012.000

Wiley Online Library. (n.d.). Strategic Management Journal: OnlineOpen. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266/homepage/FundedAccess.html