Transitioning to 100% Business E-books: The Case of Large University Business Collection

Wahib Nasrallah


The transformation of the e-book industry has been nothing less than extraordinary.  Similarly, the acceleration in academic distance learning programs has been remarkable.  The advantages of acquiring e-books for academic users have been enumerated in many ways and by many authors.  At our institution, availability, accessibility, acceptance by our patrons, and low foot print of e-books has provided a strong motivation for pursuing this new technology. This article describes how we are decisively moving toward the goal of achieving a 100% business e-book collection.


e-books; electronic books; business e-books; academic business e-books

Full Text:



Ashcroft, L. (2011). E-books in libraries: An overview of the current situation. Library Management, 32(6-7), 398-407.


Bailey, T. P., Scott, A. L., & Best, R. D. (2015). Cost differentials between E-books and print in academic libraries. College and Research Libraries, 76(1), 6-18. doi:10.5860/crl.76.1.6

Camacho, Leticia, and Andy Spackman. (2010). Transitioning to E-books: Usage and attitudes among business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 16 (1): 33-45.

Dresselhaus, A., & Shrode, F. (2012). Mobile technologies & academics: Do students use mobile technologies in their academic lives and are librarians ready to meet this challenge? Information Technology and Libraries (Online), 31(2), 82-101.

doi: 10.6017/ital.v31i2.2166

IBISWORLD. “E-Book Publishing: 51913.” IBISWORLD Industry Report, 2011 (Accessed August 7, 2012)

"Professional publishing in the digital age: E-books in libraries" by Simba information – reports- July 2010

Smith, B. A. (2008). A quantitative analysis of the impact of e-book format on student acceptance, usage and satisfaction. Capella University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (Publication No. 3329848)

Vasileiou, M. (2012). Choosing e-books: a perspective from academic libraries. Online Information Review, 36(1), 21.

DOI: 10.1108/14684521211206944